Fiji police question opposition leader who raised election concerns
The man vying to be Fiji’s next prime minister was taken into custody and questioned by police after writing to the military commander asking for an intervention in the election.
People’s Alliance leader Sitiveni Rabuka left the police station in Suva just after 10pm local time on Friday, saying he hadn’t been arrested or charged.
People’s Alliance party leader Sitiveni Rabuka after voting in Suva.Credit:Getty Images
The party’s general secretary was also taken in for questioning.
Deputy leader Lynda Tabuya said the development came as a shock but vowed to keep moving forward.
She said the party had followed the legal processes.
“We are not discouraged by this, we are steadfast,” she told reporters outside the police station before Rabuka’s release.
Tabuya said the party was told the questioning was in relation to the letter sent to the army commander.
She said Methodist Church Reverend Ili Vunisuwai was also taken in for questioning after he wrote a letter to the president and army commander and expressed concerns about the integrity of the election.
People’s Alliance and Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama’s FijiFirst party are now neck and neck in the polls, both sitting on 38 per cent with more than a quarter of polling stations counted.
People’s Alliance’s vote dropped steadily from over 50 per cent in each tally update throughout Friday, with FijiFirst clawing back ground from 22 per cent.
The National Federation Party has seven per cent of the vote while the Social Democratic Liberal Party has six.
The other five political parties remain below the five per cent threshold of votes required to qualify for a seat in the expanded 55-member parliament.
Bainimarama – who came to power after instigating a coup in 2006 – has a personal vote of 26 per cent in Fiji’s single constituency while Rabuka is sitting at 14 per cent.
A final tally is due on Sunday.
Despite being ahead in the polls before Friday’s final update, Rabuka doubled down on claims of voting data irregularities and petitioned the Fijian public to register their concerns about electoral integrity.
Rabuka also wanted the military to use its powers under the constitution to oversee a fair ballot count after alleging voting irregularities.
He said it would not be a coup because the army would not be running the government.
Major General Jone Kalouniwai declined to get involved, saying using the military in the electoral process would be unconstitutional and he maintained faith in the system.
“I wish to reassure the people of Fiji that the RFMF (Republic of Fiji Military Forces) will not respond to Rabuka’s insistence or any political party,” Maj Gen Kalouniwai told Radio NZ.
Opposition parties had raised concerns over the preliminary count after results changed dramatically when the election’s app was taken offline due to a glitch.
People’s Alliance had been ahead of FijiFirst but this swapped when the app came back online after a number of hours on Wednesday, election night.
The supervisor of elections, Mohammed Saneem, said votes had been mismatched to candidates when they were uploaded to the results app, causing some candidates to show unusually high numbers.
But Saneem said there was no problem with the database as ballots are manually counted and verified.
He said while the app was down, a substantial number of polling stations reported their results which is what updated the overall tally.
Rabuka and three other opposition party leaders say they can’t trust the information published on the app and questioned the integrity of the data transfer from the manual count to being posted online.
All declined to express faith in the Fijian Elections Office.
The Multinational Observer Group says it has not observed “any significant irregularities or issues during pre-polling, postal voting or election day voting”.
Co-chair and Australian MP Rebekha Sharkie said vote counting speed had slowed after additional safeguards were put in place after the glitch.
She expressed confidence in the ballot counting process when asked if there was any evidence to substantiate the opposition’s claims.
The organisation’s interim report noted the app is not used to count votes but only to publish results.
AAP
This article was made possible through the Melbourne Press Club’s Michael Gordon Journalism Fellowship Program.
Most Viewed in World
From our partners
Source: Read Full Article