Gold prices edge lower as some upbeat economic data dull haven demand

Gold futures gave up earlier gains to turn lower on Thursday, as some upbeat U.S. economic data dulled haven demand for the precious metal.

Prices also declined on the back of further gains in U.S. benchmark stock indexes, which followed the completion Wednesday of the first stage in a trade pact between the U.S. and China.

“Gold prices gave up their earlier gains following a wrath of positive US economic data,” said Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda, in a market update. “This week has not been good for macro-economic traders looking to make a bullish case for gold prices.”

The Philadelphia Fed said Thursday its gauge of business activity in its region surged in January. New jobless claims fell for the fifth week in a row and retail sales increased 0.3% last month, the government said Thursday. Meanwhile, the National Association of Home Builders’ monthly confidence index dropped one point to 75 in January from 76 the month prior.

Despite the mostly upbeat economic data, “the longer-term bullish trend for gold has been supported on central bank demand, geopolitical risks, trade tensions and a falling dollar,” said Moya.

Gold for February delivery GCG20, -0.17% on Comex edged down by $2.80, or 0.2%, at $1,551.20 an ounce, trading between a low of $1,550.70 and high of $1,558.20. Prices settled 0.6% higher a day earlier.

March silver SIH20, -0.16%, meanwhile, shed 1.8 cents, or 0.1%, at $17.97 an ounce, after rising 1.4% on Wednesday.

The move for gold comes as the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +0.63%  broke through a 1000-point milestone at 29,000 recently representing a record run for the broader stock market that has been at least partially fueled by Wednesday’s signing of the initial part of multi-level trade agreement between the U.S. and China.

Commodities experts, however, say that gold has found some support from a weaker U.S. dollar and benchmark government bond yields which look to end the week lower, providing a runway for gold to produce a modest rise above a level at $1,550 considered support for the yellow metal.

“The recovery to this threshold is positive for gold, as it’s showing a healthy appetite for bullion, despite the general risk-on scenario which has followed the signing of the Phase One deal between US and China,” wrote Carlo Alberto De Casa, chief analyst at ActivTrades in a daily research note.

On Thursday, yields for the 10-year benchmark note TMUBMUSD10Y, +0.93% were trading higher at 1.8058%, while the dollar, as measured by the ICE U.S. Dollar Index DXY, +0.10% was little changed at 97.264.

“We are seeing lower volatility again on gold, with the bullion price steady just above the support level of $1,550,” De Casa said.

On top of that investors are betting that the Federal Reserve will keep federal-funds rates anchored at a 1.75%-2% range in 2020, which also may offer more reason for gold and other precious metals, which don’t bear a yield, to advance. Expectations for lower rates for a longer period, also have boosted the equity markets, resulting in a tandem runup for stocks and gold, which usually move in opposite directions.

Elsewhere on Comex, prices for copper were little changed, with the March contract HGH20, -0.10% up 0.05% at $2.8675 a pound. April platinum PLJ20, -1.36% edged down by 0.9% to $1,016.40 an ounce after settling Wednesday above $1,000 for the first time since 2018.

March palladium PAH20, +0.95% continued to hit record levels, with prices up 1.1% at $2,188.50 an ounce in Thursday dealings.

“The rocket ship palladium price goes ever higher breaking price record after record,” R. Michael Jones, chief executive offer of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. PLG, +0.64% told MarketWatch. “If you want to build a car you have to have the stuff.”

“At 0.15 ounces per car roughly for every 100 cars off the line about 15 ounces are needed,” he said. So a $1000 move up in palladium is about $150 extra cost per car – it is not enough to stop the car being made and bought. Clean air standards are not going to be relaxed because it costs $150 more for a modern car.”

Source: Read Full Article